In Third Person

A personal look into video games, the video game industry and video game culture.

Image from Alcoholic Gamer

During a lapse in my gaming itinerary, I decided to pop Mirror's Edge back into my 360. Last time I wrote about this game, the game tried really hard to make me not like it. The game succeeded at that. I still love the premise of a free-running first-person game, but I stopped at the end of the second level in frustration, after dying roughly 50 times.

After a few minutes in the training level, I thought I was ready to go. What the training mode didn't prepare me for was encountering trial-and-error gameplay and crappy combat.

The biggest issue for me was that the game doesn't make it clear enough for where you need to go. There are obvious elements for you to grab onto, which are coloured red, but it's usually not that clear in the heat of battle. In the third level, I got to a point where I had absolutely no idea how to get out of the area before the guards came. I had to watch a YouTube video for the answer and when I saw it, I said to myself, "WTF!@#" I never would have come up with that solution myself. Due to the way the levels are designed, I get that feeling all the time. I could follow along with one of the many guides online if I really wanted to, but a game really shouldn't make me resort to that.


To compound the issue of getting lost, oftentimes you're under the gun by guards. In a game designed around running, the combat feels horribly out of place and leaves you greatly underpowered. Hand-to-hand combat is really clunky and enemies can kill you very quickly. Picking up a gun doesn't help much either, since the actual shooting mechanics are pretty bad and carrying a gun actually slows your character down.

I applaud Dice and EA for trying something ambitious with Mirror's Edge. I can see why some people absolutely loved this game. When it has you free-running and doing crazy acrobatics, it can be some of the most exhilarating action you'll ever experience. But to counter-point, there are a lot of people that hate this game, too. The problem is that the game isn't that awesome all the time. The experience is hampered by somewhat clunky controls, level designs that aren't easy to navigate on your own and terrible combat.

Image from On Mirror's Edge

A sequel to this game has been confirmed
, and it'll be interesting to see how they handle it. A lot of people have asked for Mirror's Edge to go third-person, but I think that would take away the most unique aspect of the game. Without being in first-person, it's just another Prince of Persia or Assassin's Creed style game. I do hope they polish the controls and make the areas easier to navigate. As far as combat, they can either improve the game by improving the combat mechanics or stripping combat from the experience completely to focus on the acrobatics. I won't be the first in line to pick up Mirror's Edge 2, but I'll continue to hope they refine this idea to perfection.

Image from IGN

Released in 2008, Mirror's Edge was a game I was following closely. The concept of a game built around first-person parkour action in concept seemed totally awesome and totally un-doable. Most first-person games don't even let you see your own feet, control like you're a walking turret rather than a person, and platforming elements more often than not are a chore. How could a developer pull off such acrobatics from a first-person perspective?

Well, the game turned out good, hitting 79 on Metacritic, but a few of the flaws I found in the demo (as well as a limited budget and other games to get) prevented me from "jumping in" (sorry for the pun). I thought that the parkour action at its best was exhilarating in a way a video game has never made me feel before. However, I felt like I was constantly fighting with the controls and the combat systems felt clunky. I would die repeatedly because of the controls not doing what I wanted, which either caused me to fall off a building or get shot in the face at point blank range.

Image from Got Game

In spite of all that, I still wanted to give the game a chance. Today, I finally bought a used copy of the game for $5. At that price, I think I could take a chance on it. I also got Crackdown for $5, which was a game I waited even longer on to try out, but I'll talk about that another day.

I admit, I'm currently not that far into Mirror's Edge. From what I've seen so far though, it's kind of everything I hoped for (and feared) when I played the demo. The art style is awesome, the scenarios are exciting and the sensation of being a free runner flawlessly doing crazy stunts is incredible. But with all the awesomeness came dying. A lot. I must have died roughly 40 times in 60 minutes because I couldn't get a grasp of the controls. I feel that the buttons by default are mapped weird, and don't always respond the way I want them too. Also, the game really does fall apart when you're forced to fight, because the hand-to-hand combat and shooting engine are pretty bad.

I really want to love this game. I applaud Dice and EA for taking a chance on this and am glad that a sequel is on the way. I'll give the game more time and hopefully the game can change my opinion over the course of the game.